<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Design &amp; Branding on Lynx Tech Blog</title><link>https://blog.lynxflow.co/en/categories/design--branding/</link><description>Recent content in Design &amp; Branding on Lynx Tech Blog</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 09:00:00 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://blog.lynxflow.co/en/categories/design--branding/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>After 100 Logos: A Postmortem of the Third Wave in Exhaustive Brand Exploration</title><link>https://blog.lynxflow.co/en/posts/hundred-logos-third-wave-2026-08-24/</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 09:00:00 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://blog.lynxflow.co/en/posts/hundred-logos-third-wave-2026-08-24/</guid><description>&lt;img src="https://blog.lynxflow.co/images/2026-08-24-third-wave.webp" alt="Featured image of post After 100 Logos: A Postmortem of the Third Wave in Exhaustive Brand Exploration" /&gt;Goal: One Hundred Comparable Candidates After the first two batches, there were 28 directions on the comparison board. This round&amp;rsquo;s goal was much more ambitious: fill the board with one hundred usable logo candidates and lay them all out so I could pick through them one by one.
&amp;ldquo;Usable&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;padding the numbers&amp;rdquo; are two entirely different things. The lessons from the first two batches were clear enough: the agent reviewer only checked path coordinates, not actual re</description></item></channel></rss>