<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Geometry on Lynx Tech Blog</title><link>https://blog.lynxflow.co/en/tags/geometry/</link><description>Recent content in Geometry on Lynx Tech Blog</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 00:05:00 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://blog.lynxflow.co/en/tags/geometry/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Finding a Mathematical Core for a Logo: Generation and Screening of the Second Batch of Geometric Candidates</title><link>https://blog.lynxflow.co/en/posts/geometry-logo-concepts-math-kernel-2026-08-24/</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 00:05:00 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://blog.lynxflow.co/en/posts/geometry-logo-concepts-math-kernel-2026-08-24/</guid><description>&lt;img src="https://blog.lynxflow.co/images/2026-08-24-geometry-logo-concepts.webp?v=090123" alt="Featured image of post Finding a Mathematical Core for a Logo: Generation and Screening of the Second Batch of Geometric Candidates" /&gt;From &amp;ldquo;Looking Good&amp;rdquo; to &amp;ldquo;Having Substance&amp;rdquo; After the first batch of 13 non-Lynx directions went live yesterday, I set a new requirement: another round, this time with geometry, mathematics, and a strong design sensibility.
This requirement actually marks a shift in my thinking. In the first batch, many concepts were &amp;ldquo;drawn by feel&amp;rdquo;—they looked nice, but ask &amp;ldquo;why does this shape look like this?&amp;rdquo; and the answer is often just &amp;ldquo;because it looks go</description></item></channel></rss>