<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hyperliquid on Lynx Tech Blog</title><link>https://blog.lynxflow.co/en/tags/hyperliquid/</link><description>Recent content in Hyperliquid on Lynx Tech Blog</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 12:56:00 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://blog.lynxflow.co/en/tags/hyperliquid/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>My Quant Platform Was Throwing Away 92% of the Trades — and Believed It Saw Everything</title><link>https://blog.lynxflow.co/en/posts/alphatrace-venue-data-loss-2026/</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 12:56:00 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://blog.lynxflow.co/en/posts/alphatrace-venue-data-loss-2026/</guid><description>&lt;img src="https://blog.lynxflow.co/images/alphatrace-venue-data-loss-2026.png" alt="Featured image of post My Quant Platform Was Throwing Away 92% of the Trades — and Believed It Saw Everything" /&gt;TL;DR While adding a data source to AlphaTrace, I ran a routine check against live data and found something I had never once doubted: the platform silently discards 92% of spot trades the moment it reads them off-chain — and says nothing. This post is about that self-correction, and about the second mistake I nearly made.
It started with someone else&amp;rsquo;s article A few days ago I read a write-up: two people ran a cross-market arbitrage between Hyperliquid&amp;rsquo;s equity perpetuals and the tra</description></item><item><title>39 Trades, 10 Hypotheses — and the Top-Matching Strategy Rests on Just 3 Data Points</title><link>https://blog.lynxflow.co/en/posts/alphatrace-honest-quant-2026/</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://blog.lynxflow.co/en/posts/alphatrace-honest-quant-2026/</guid><description>&lt;img src="https://blog.lynxflow.co/images/alphatrace-honest-quant-2026.png" alt="Featured image of post 39 Trades, 10 Hypotheses — and the Top-Matching Strategy Rests on Just 3 Data Points" /&gt;TL;DR I fed 39 on-chain trades into 10 competing strategy hypotheses on AlphaTrace, the quant analysis platform I built myself, hoping to find &amp;ldquo;what method these trades are most likely following.&amp;rdquo; The top-ranked strategy ended up resting on just 3 valid data points, and its explanatory power was the lowest of all ten hypotheses — it took the crown purely because it&amp;rsquo;s the simplest.
That&amp;rsquo;s not a bug. This is what an honest quant analysis is supposed to look like: the explan</description></item><item><title>Arbitraging $10M in 10 Months: A Deep Dive into the Hyperliquid HIP-3 Cross-Market Strategy</title><link>https://blog.lynxflow.co/en/posts/hyperliquid-hip3-arbitrage-10m-usd/</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://blog.lynxflow.co/en/posts/hyperliquid-hip3-arbitrage-10m-usd/</guid><description>&lt;img src="https://blog.lynxflow.co/images/hyperliquid-hip3-arbitrage-10m-usd.png" alt="Featured image of post Arbitraging $10M in 10 Months: A Deep Dive into the Hyperliquid HIP-3 Cross-Market Strategy" /&gt;TL;DR A two-person arbitrage team built a Delta arbitrage bot between Hyperliquid&amp;rsquo;s HIP-3 stock perpetual markets and the traditional brokerage IBKR. Over 10 months, it processed roughly $32 billion in trading volume and earned about $10 million in profit, with an annualized return on capital of 35%-45%.
The original piece was written by Twitter user CBB (@Cbb0fe), compiled into Chinese by Odaily (translator: Azuma), and published on September 3, 2026. The image-text notes circulating on X</description></item><item><title>I Ran the Retail-Trader Hunt on the Data: Zero Survivors, but a Real Edge Exists — It Just Lives in the Machines</title><link>https://blog.lynxflow.co/en/posts/lynxcrypto-trader-hunt-empirical/</link><pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2026 10:00:00 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://blog.lynxflow.co/en/posts/lynxcrypto-trader-hunt-empirical/</guid><description>&lt;img src="https://blog.lynxflow.co/images/lynxcrypto-trader-hunt-empirical.png" alt="Featured image of post I Ran the Retail-Trader Hunt on the Data: Zero Survivors, but a Real Edge Exists — It Just Lives in the Machines" /&gt; My previous post ended with &amp;ldquo;didn&amp;rsquo;t find that retail trader, probably never will.&amp;rdquo; This one is what happened when I actually ran the data: zero survivors. But the sentence more valuable than &amp;ldquo;didn&amp;rsquo;t find one&amp;rdquo; is this — the data does contain a statistically-significant trading edge, but it lives entirely in multi-coin systematic strategies, and not a single one of them is &amp;ldquo;a human making directional calls on a few instruments.&amp;rdquo; Real edge exists, ju</description></item><item><title>I Went Looking for a Retail Perpetual Futures Trader to Copy — Didn't Find One, and Probably Never Will</title><link>https://blog.lynxflow.co/en/posts/lynxcrypto-perp-trader-hunt/</link><pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2026 09:00:00 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://blog.lynxflow.co/en/posts/lynxcrypto-perp-trader-hunt/</guid><description>&lt;img src="https://blog.lynxflow.co/images/lynxcrypto-perp-trader-hunt.png" alt="Featured image of post I Went Looking for a Retail Perpetual Futures Trader to Copy — Didn't Find One, and Probably Never Will" /&gt; Let me start with the conclusion — also the most valuable sentence in this entire post: I looked, and I didn&amp;rsquo;t find one. Under the combined constraint of &amp;ldquo;public + independently verifiable + over 2 years + retail + perpetual futures + net profitable after funding,&amp;rdquo; not a single trader survived verification. All five candidates were rejected, zero survivors. But more important than &amp;ldquo;didn&amp;rsquo;t find one&amp;rdquo; is the second sentence: this question, under the bar I set, m</description></item></channel></rss>