<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Startup Compliance on Lynx Tech Blog</title><link>https://blog.lynxflow.co/en/tags/startup-compliance/</link><description>Recent content in Startup Compliance on Lynx Tech Blog</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2026 03:20:00 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://blog.lynxflow.co/en/tags/startup-compliance/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>How Far Can Software Copyright Go as Capital? What 59 Research Agents Found About the Legal Boundary</title><link>https://blog.lynxflow.co/en/posts/software-copyright-capital-contribution/</link><pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2026 03:20:00 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://blog.lynxflow.co/en/posts/software-copyright-capital-contribution/</guid><description>&lt;img src="https://blog.lynxflow.co/images/software-copyright-capital-contribution-cover.png" alt="Featured image of post How Far Can Software Copyright Go as Capital? What 59 Research Agents Found About the Legal Boundary" /&gt; Three conclusions up front. First, contributing a software copyright as capital is legal — Article 48 of China&amp;rsquo;s Company Law permits intellectual property as a contribution. Second, to justify a valuation of 1 million RMB for a single copyright, you need roughly 4 to 6 million RMB of annual revenue attributable to it. Below that level, the income approach simply cannot produce the number. Third, and most critically: Article 18, paragraph 2, item 1 of China&amp;rsquo;s Copyright Law names &amp;ldq</description></item></channel></rss>