<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Zhihu on Lynx Tech Blog</title><link>https://blog.lynxflow.co/en/tags/zhihu/</link><description>Recent content in Zhihu on Lynx Tech Blog</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 21:30:00 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://blog.lynxflow.co/en/tags/zhihu/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Dissecting 371 Zhihu Answers: How Public Opinion Around "350,000 Yuan to Investigate Mo Yan's Family Background" Was Ignited</title><link>https://blog.lynxflow.co/en/posts/moyan-zhihu-371-answers/</link><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 21:30:00 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://blog.lynxflow.co/en/posts/moyan-zhihu-371-answers/</guid><description>&lt;img src="https://blog.lynxflow.co/images/moyan-zhihu-371-answers.png?v=090500" alt="Featured image of post Dissecting 371 Zhihu Answers: How Public Opinion Around "350,000 Yuan to Investigate Mo Yan's Family Background" Was Ignited" /&gt;This Is the Second Half of the Previous Piece A couple of days ago I wrote “350,000 Yuan Over Six Years: How Should We Judge the Cost of Studying Mo Yan?”. That one was an opinion piece. After publishing it, I felt uneasy: opinions are one thing, but were the facts complete? What exactly were all those people arguing about in the comments?
So over the past two days I did some grunt work: I dug through the project’s background in detail, then scraped 371 answers under that Zhihu question out of a</description></item></channel></rss>